Павел Алейников сфотографировал дымный след в тот момент, когда дымный след находился на расстоянии 600 метров от точки "В".
Do you mean that at the time Aleynikov made his pictures the smoke trail had moved 600 meters westward from point B?
Они обосновали это мнением эксперта, что дымный след ракеты 9М38 может висеть в воздухе 5-6 минут.
In court I have not heard no one saying anything about the maximum duration of a Buk smoke plume. I asked Esa Kelloniemi. He is a former officer of a Finish Buk battalion. He says that, depending on the weather conditions, a smoke plume can stay visible for half an hour.
В другом месте обвинение и суд заявили, что время фотографирования было на одну минуту раньше, чем время EXIF, то есть 13:24:40/50.
On 8 June 2021 the female judge said that experts of the the Dutch National Forensic Institute (NFI) had established that the clock of the camera deviated one minute. She did not say if the clock was running one minute slow of one minute ahead. She did not specify the deviation of the clock.
Фотографии (или кадры видео) наклонного дымного следа сделаны приблизительно в то же самое время, что и фотографии Алейникова, то есть на расстоянии 600 метров от точки "В".
You mean the photos or video frames that were taken from Snizhne? These were made by a lady by the name of Irina Mazurova. She lives in Kursk now.
В Точка (?) в азимуте тени на фото Алейникова мы проводили натурный эксперимент на основании тени мачты на магазине с усредненным результатом - 13:21:35.
Interesting. I have read about your experiment in an article by Bellingcat.
Если сопло действительно принадлежит ракете, сбившей боинг, то тогда известен и номер ракеты, сбившей боинг.
It is unclear when and where the venturi was found and by whom. The defense has tried to find out, but no answers were given by the prosecution. We simply do not know it the venturi is from a missile that was fired on 17 July 2014.
The same thing with the motor casing. We do not know if it is from a missile that was fired on 17 July 2014. It was recovered 9 months after 17 July 2014 near Petropavlivka. An unknown person led the Dutch recovery team to the place where he had found the casing. The prosecution was unwilling to tell the defense lawyers who this person was. The lawyers were not even allowed to know the identity of the members of the recovery team.
In the end the prosecution did not present the venturi and the motor casing as evidence for the downing of MH17.
В ходе суда выяснилось, что в уголовном деле есть какая-то информация об обнаружении ракетного топлива на фрагментах боинга.
You mean PETN was found? Indeed it was found, but only on the left engine cowling ring.
Во-первых, я не согласен, что на фрагментах боинга вообще нет следов бабочек.
Do you agree it’s in the eye of the beholder if butterfly shaped impact holes are visible in these two pictures? One investigator of JIT, a Belgian gentleman from RMA, pointed to only one impact hole that according to him was butterfly shaped. The investigator of JIT did not agree.
Like I said, JIT performed two tests with 9N314M warheads. In both cases the metal plates were riddled with i-beam / butterfly shaped impact holes.
Вы можете поверить, что в течение двух часов было радиомолчание?
You assume that there was no radio silence? And if yes, what do you think the DNR militia was talking about?
Вы знаете, что ополченцы и местные жители были убеждены, что в 13 часов будет мощный налет украинской авиации.
I read this in your open letter to the court, prosecution, JIT and defense lawyers. I’m interested to know how you know. What is your source?
Как-то объяснить, что взорвалось в небе восточнее Грабово во время падения боинга в Грабово.
I read something about this in your letter. Can you please send me the urls to witness statements about this explosion east of Grabovo?
Понять, что за горизонтальный след был над свидетелем А26 в поселке Крупской.
How do you know witness A26 lives in the village of Krupskaya? This was not mentioned in court. Pulatov;s lawyers said it was unclear to them where this person lived. And what’s the relevance of this witness statement? As far as I know A26 had called the witness telephone of the JIT. He stated that the Aleynikov smoke trail photo cannot be real due to the weather conditions that day. Besides, if the trail was real, he should have seen it and heard the missile. In the photo, the track hangs above the village where he lives, and he was also at home that day.
